Jump to content

Talk:Joseph Stalin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateJoseph Stalin is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleJoseph Stalin has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 18, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 7, 2018Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 3, 2006, April 3, 2008, April 3, 2011, April 3, 2012, April 3, 2014, April 3, 2016, April 3, 2018, April 3, 2020, and April 3, 2022.
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Stalin statutory rape

[edit]

@Smallangryplanet There isn't any evidence Khrushchev tried to smear Stalin, at least the allegation isn't made in any credible sources. The first biography cited by Suny (2020) cites 3 other bios, including a Russian one I could not translate. The 2 English ones cited are Young Stalin and Stalin Unknown Portrait. Montiefore(chp.34) cites archival documents directly for the details of the event and also mentions a 1956 politburo report that signed of by all present and was then made secret. Kun(pg.168) cites archives and directly quotes villagers including Lidia herself from an interview in which she recalled details of her relationship and Svetlana(Stalin's daughter) after she defected in 1969. Both sources mention other rumors and accounts of the event, the earliest of which(according to Monteifore) is Essad Bey’s 1931 biography. No source cites Khrushchev or disputes that the 2 had a relationship. Originalcola (talk) 21:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences is a pretty notable piece of evidence that Khrushchev had it in for Stalin! Montefiore's sourcing for this story in particular is considered especially inconclusive by at least one review, (also available at DOI 10.1017/S0037677900010202) so I think it's accurate to add "alleged" given the difficulty of validating the information. Smallangryplanet (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Monteifore's biography has quite a bit of sensationalism in it but most major Stalin biographies released since then include this story(Kotkin's 2018 Stalin bio for example) without doubting it's authenticity and citing archival sources directly. Originalcola (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to assume good faith but please remember that articles are meant to be written from a netural point of view, its seems you also 'have it in' for Stalin. Please don't synthesise popular history articles and rumours into your own original research. 185.3.86.208 (talk) 02:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, Khrushchev did not "have it in for Stalin." The Secret Speech was a political document that sought to extricate the Communist Party leadership from having any responsibility for Stalin's misdeeds (a difficult task given Khrushchev and the rest of the leadership dutifully served Stalin in carrying out said misdeeds), so it's definitely not intended as an objective analysis, but Khrushchev in that same speech says that all the groundless repressions and other harmful actions of Stalin were not "the deeds of a giddy despot. He considered that this should be done in the interest of the Party; of the working masses, in the name of the defense of the revolution's gains. In this lies the whole tragedy!" Any biography of Khrushchev I'm aware of, such as William Taubman's, make the point that Khrushchev's attitude toward Stalin was not wholly negative, however unsatisfying the Secret Speech is as a document seeking to explain what happened and why. --Ismail (talk) 08:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Torturer category

[edit]

Would the torturer category be appropriate here? 2600:100C:A21D:971A:3DFA:A9B2:FCD8:A60 (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler is a Dictator and Stalin a "political theorist" and Leader

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Wikipedia profile on Hitler brands him a "Dictator" while Wikipedia profile on Stalin protects and promotes him as a "political theorist" and "leader".

This is a direct violation of neutral point of view policy 208.102.165.164 (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.