Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomical objects
Main | Talk | Astronomical objects (Talk) | Eclipses (Talk) | Article ratings | Image review | Popular pages | Members | Wikidata |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Astronomical objects and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical objects:
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Edit this box |
Project-independent quality assessments
[edit]solstation.com
[edit]There are about 70 references to solstation.com, which I expect are mostly links (possibly some have been changed to an archive link). solstation.com has been dead (according to reddit) for about 6 months. Lavateraguy (talk) 17:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- WP:URLREQ might be the best place to deal with that, get a bot to post up archives if they're available. Primefac (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
New exoplanets discovered?
[edit]I saw that there was a page with confirmed exoplanets, and I skimmed through it, and was wondering if there was still observations going for more of these mysterious exoplanets (my personal favorite is J1407b!) AstronomyKid1 (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hundreds of new exoplanets are discovered every year, see [1] and sort by 'discovery' year. There are about a thousand scientific papers each year that study them in more detail, such as performing follow-up observations or detailed simulations. Modest Genius talk 15:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- With these sorts of numbers, I'm honestly a little surprised that JWST is only 9-times oversubscribed.... Primefac (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll keep an eye out for more! I'm eager to work with you guys! <3
- -AstronomyKid1 AstronomyKid1 (talk) 17:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I also would like to know what your favorite exoplanet is <3 (Just out of curiosity) AstronomyKid1 (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well the most studied exoplanetary system is TRAPPIST-1. I'd say the most interesting to me, being the nearest candidate, is Proxima b. That article could probably be turned into an FA. The discovery was announced on 24 August 2016, so the same date in 2026 would be the 10th anniversary and likely to get it front page coverage. Praemonitus (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think Proxima Centauri b wouldn't be that hard to turn into a FA. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well the most studied exoplanetary system is TRAPPIST-1. I'd say the most interesting to me, being the nearest candidate, is Proxima b. That article could probably be turned into an FA. The discovery was announced on 24 August 2016, so the same date in 2026 would be the 10th anniversary and likely to get it front page coverage. Praemonitus (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- I also would like to know what your favorite exoplanet is <3 (Just out of curiosity) AstronomyKid1 (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:2MASS J05352184−0546085#Requested move 29 December 2024
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2MASS J05352184−0546085#Requested move 29 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Help needed at Talk:Minor-planet moon#Source of the provisional designations?
[edit]Your participation in the discussion linked above would be greatly appreciated. There are some major problems with the list of minor-planet moons. Please take a look. Renerpho (talk) 16:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)